Jian Ghomeshi: Legal Shades of Grey (Part III)

by | Nov 28, 2014 | For Employers

Jian Ghomeshi: Legal Shades of Grey (Part III)

by | Nov 28, 2014 | For Employers

The Background

On October 27, 2014 the CBC terminated Mr. Ghomeshi’s employment. Later that day he disclosed some intensely private information about his sex life in a public Facebook post.

On October 28, 2014 I posted a blog outlining some of the issues that arose out of his termination.

Since that time Mr. Ghomeshi has filed and withdrawn a $ 55 000 000 law suit against the CBC.

Mr. Ghomeshi has also filed a grievance under his collective agreement challenging his termination. If his grievance proceeds to arbitration, he will almost certainly be seeking reinstatement with full back pay.

On November 4th, the CBC hired an outside investigator who will speak to any employee who wishes to file a complaint against Mr. Ghomeshi. I have also posted a blog which contains my thoughts on this investigator’s mandate.

The Latest Development: Criminal Charges

In the last month, a number of women contacted the police who conducted an investigation.

On November 26, 2014 Jian Ghomeshi was charged under the Criminal Code and was released on $ 100 000 bail. He will face four charges of sexual assault and one charge of overcome resistance – choking

What Happens Next

The Grievance. Mr. Ghomeshi’s grievance will almost certainly not proceed any further until the criminal proceedings are concluded.

Regardless of the outcome of the criminal proceedings, the union must decide whether or not to submit Mr. Ghomeshi’s grievance to arbitration. If the union genuinely believes that the CBC can prove just cause for termination then the union is under no obligation to take Mr. Ghomeshi’s case forward.  I would not be surprised if the union decides to drop Mr. Ghomeshi’s case if he is found guilty.

If the union takes Mr. Ghomeshi’s case to arbitration then an adjudicator must decide whether or not the CBC had just cause to discipline Mr. Ghomeshi and if so whether or not termination was the appropriate punishment. If he is found guilty, I believe most arbitrators would uphold the discharge in this case.

The Criminal Charges. The CBC will closely watch the criminal proceedings and will try to use any evidence that is submitted to support the discharge at any arbitration that subsequently takes place.

Potential Civil Case Against Mr. Ghomeshi. Any woman who was sexually assaulted by Mr. Ghomeshi has two years from the date of the assault to commence a civil action against him for the tort of sexual assault. To date, there are no reports that any woman has done so.

Potential Human Rights Case Against the CBC & Mr. Ghomeshi. Any woman who was sexually harassed or subject to a poisoned work environment has 12 months to file a complaint under the Canada Human Rights Act from the date the discriminatory act took place. To date, there are no reports that any woman has done so.

For the past 25 years, Doug MacLeod of the MacLeod Law Firm has restricted his law practice to employment and human rights law. He represents employers and employees. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]

The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.

 

k

Recent Posts

Reducing Litigation Risk

In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...

read more

The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.

 

k

Recent Posts

Reducing Litigation Risk

In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...

read more

Toronto Office

702 - 2 Bloor Street West,
Toronto, ON M4W 3E2

Barrie Office

277 - 92 Caplan Avenue,
Barrie, ON L4N 9J2

Collingwood Office

220 - 1 First Street
Collingwood, ON
L9Y 1A1

Locations

Toronto Office

700 - 2 Bloor Street West, Toronto ON M4W 3E2

Barrie Office

277 - 92 Caplan Avenue, Barrie ON L4N 9J2

Collingwood Office

220 - 1 First Street, Collingwood, ON L9Y 1A1

Translate

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!