Human Rights Update: Minimum Wage Cook Receives Large Damage Award
Shirley Jensen worked as a cook in a restaurant and earned $ 10.25 per hour. She had fibromyalgia. To manage pain, she attended a pain clinic twice a week. From time to time, she also needed to obtain major treatments which required two days off work. These days changed when the medical facility changed its days of operation. The employer refused to permit her to change her days off and fired her. Ms. Jensen secured another job 15 weeks later.
Ms. Jensen filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (the Tribunal) claiming she was discriminated against on the basis of her disability. She represented herself at the hearing.
The Tribunal ordered the two owners of the restaurant to pay Ms. Jensen 15 weeks pay or $ 7,380. Even though she did not ask for compensation for injury to her dignity, feelings and self-respect, the Tribunal ordered the employer to pay Ms. Jensen an additional $ 15, 000 in general damages.
For more information on the Ontario Human Rights Code, click here
Lessons to be learned
1. An employer must grant unpaid time off work to an employee to attend required medical appointments if the employee cannot schedule appointments outside her regular hours of work.
2. An employee can bring no cost legal proceedings against an employer under the Human Rights Code.
3. An employee can represent herself at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.
4. Adjudicators at the Tribunal will order an employer to pay an employee damages for the injury to her dignity, feelings and self-respect even if the employee does not ask for these damages.
5. A minimum wage employee with relatively short service can be awarded significant damages under the Ontario Human Rights Code.
For the past 25 years, Doug MacLeod of the MacLeod Law Firm has been advising employers on all aspects of the employment relationship. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022
Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 - Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency...
Reducing Litigation Risk
In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...
Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy
A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October...