Disabled Employee Earning $ 22 000 Per Year Awarded $ 110 000 Damages
In my experience, many employees are now claiming more than one type of legal damages in wrongful dismissal cases. This is particularly the case when the employee is disabled.
A recent Ontario case is a good example.
The Facts
Ms. Strudwick worked for an employer that recruited individuals to participate in focus groups. She was paid $ 12.85 per hour and her duties involved data entry, and instructing recruiting staff.
In 2010, Ms. Strudwick became deaf. According to the trial judge: “…her employer’s attitude towards her and treatment of her became unconscionable. The plaintiff deposed she was constantly belittled, humiliated and isolated.” Among other things, the employer refused to accommodate her disability.
She was fired for just cause after more than 15 years’ service because at a Toastmaster’s meeting that was held at the workplace “she did not select a topic from those she had prepared or speak on any topic the requisite one or two minutes.”
Decision
The trial judge concluded she was not terminated for just cause, the employer refused to accommodate her disability, the termination caused Ms. Strudwick to suffer a medical disorder, and the employer treated Ms. Strudwick in a harsh and demeaning manner.
Damage Award
Wrongful Dismissal Damages
At the time she was terminated, Ms. Strudwick was 59 years old, had worked for almost 16 years, and held an administrative position. The judge ordered the employer to pay her 24 months’ pay in lieu of notice and about $ 6000 in lieu of lost benefits during that time.
Human Rights Damages
The judge awarded her $ 20 000 in general damages under the Ontario Human Rights Code.
Damages for Intentional Infliction of Mental Stress
The judge concluded that the employer’s conduct caused Ms. Strudwick to suffer an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood which required psychological treatment and ordered the employer to pay almost $ 19 000 for the cost of this treatment.
Punitive damages
The judge ordered $ 15 000 in punitive damages because he did not think the other damage awards adequately accomplished the objectives of “retribution, deterrence and denunciation.”
Lessons to Be Learned
- Disabled employees have additional legal rights. Accordingly, employers should make themselves aware of these rights. For more information on the rights of disabled employees, click here.
- Any request for accommodation should be taken very seriously and failure to do so can result in significant legal damages. For information on the duty to accommodate, click here.
- Trying to force an employee to quit – especially a disabled employee – can result in additional legal damages.
- Judges have the discretion to order an employer to pay a sympathetic employee many different types of damages. For more information on different types of wrongful dismissal damages, click here.
- Always consult with an employment lawyer before terminating a disabled employee.
For more than 25 years, Doug MacLeod of the MacLeod Law Firm has been advising and representing Ontario employers. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Recent Posts
Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022
Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 - Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency...
Reducing Litigation Risk
In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...
Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy
A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October...