Reasonable Notice – It Works Both Ways | MacLeod Law Firm
Reasonable Notice of Resignation
Many people think an employee is required to provide two weeks notice of resignation by law. However, neither the Ontario government nor the Ontario courts have made this a legal requirement.
The Employment Standard Act does not require an employee to provide a minimum notice of resignation.
The Ontario courts generally require an employee to provide their employer with reasonable notice of resignation. If an employee fails to provide reasonable notice of resignation and the employer has incurred damages as a result, then the employer is able to seek these damages against the employee.
Normally, an employer will bring this kind of claim when an employee has resigned, started working for a competitor, and the employer is also suing the employee for breaching his fiduciary duties and/or his contractual non-solicitation obligations.
A Cautionary Tale: GasTOPS Ltd. v. Forsyth
The Facts
In this case, the employer developed its technology largely through contracts with two clients. Four employees decided to resign and almost immediately started a competing business which targeted the employer’s customers. None of the software programs developed by the employer’s competitors at that time were as sophisticated or as extensive as the employer’s product line.
The Actions Commenced Against the Employees
The employer sued the employees for:
– Breach of Fiduciary Duty
– Misappropriation and unauthorized or unlawful use of confidential information
– Misappropriation and unauthorized or unlawful use of trade secrets
– Misappropriation of corporate opportunities
– Breach of confidence
– Breach of contract. The employer claimed that the employees failed to provide reasonable notice of resignation.
The Decision
The employees argued that the two weeks notice of termination provided was reasonable. The trial judge disagreed and suggested the employees should have provided 10 to 12 months notice of resignation. The Ontario Court of Appeal did not have to decide this issue but did state: “we should not be taken to agree with the 10-12 months suggested by the trial judge or the factors he considered in reaching that period.” This suggests to us that the Court of Appeal believed that the 10 to 12 months notice requirement suggested by the judge was too long in this case.
The employees were ordered to pay the employer over $12,000,000 in damages plus over $4,000,000 in legal costs. The trial took 295 days. Stay tuned to find out whether this case is appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Lessons to be Learned
- An employee may be required to provide an employer with considerably more than two weeks notice of resignation.
- An employer must prove that the employee’s failure to provide notice of resignation has caused damages.
- An employer and an employee can agree on a specific notice of resignation period in an employment contract and thereby agree on what is “reasonable” notice of resignation.
If you have any questions about an employer’s obligations to a terminated employee, please call us at 1–888-640-1728 or email us at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Recent Posts
Investigating Workplace Harassment Complaints: The Basics
What is the definition of harassment? This blog discusses an employer’s legal obligation to investigate workplace harassment complaints and how to limit the cost of these investigations.
Urgent Employer Alert: Have You Had Your Employment Contract Reviewed Lately?
All organizations should have their employment contract reviewed by an employment lawyer every year or two.
Knowingly Misleading An Employee Can Result in Special Damages
A recent Supreme Court of Canada case, C.M. Callow Inc. vs. Zollinger, imposes an obligation on an employer not to knowingly mislead an employee about how it intends to exercise its contractual rights. The Facts In this case, a number of condo corporations entered into a two year contract with Mr. Callow to perform winter maintenance […]