Employee Benefits: The Potential Costs of Not Continuing Them Upon Termination
Did you know that an employer is generally required to maintain an employee’s benefits until the end of the minimum notice period provided for under the Employment Standards Act (ESA) whether or not the employer provides the employee with actual notice of termination.
Is the employer also required to continue benefit plan contributions throughout the common law “reasonable notice period” which is almost always longer than the ESA notice period? Ontario’s Court of Appeal recently answered this question.
Brito v. Canac Kitchens : The Facts
Canac Kitchen terminated Mr. Brito’s employment after 24 years service. Within two weeks, Mr. Brito, 55 years old, found another job however his new employer did not provide short-term or long-term disability benefits. About 1 ½ years later, Mr. Brito was diagnosed with cancer which resulted in surgery, chemotherapy and a total disability.
Mr. Brito claimed that Canac should have continued his long-term disability coverage throughout the common law reasonable notice period. The trial judge agreed. He found that Mr. Brito should have received 22 months notice of termination and because the total disability took place during the reasonable notice period he was entitled to receive, among other damages, an amount equal to the LTD benefits he would have received from the date he became totally disabled within the meaning of Canac’s LTD policy until he turned 65 years old.
Lessons To Be Learned
1. An employer’s obligation to continue benefits for a terminated employee is not limited to the minimum notice period under the Employment Standards Act.
2. Most LTD plans do not allow an employer to continue LTD coverage for a terminated employee beyond the ESA minimum notice period. The chance of a person becoming totally disabled may be small however the employer’s potential legal exposure is usually HUGE.
3. Reaching an early settlement with a terminated employee where the person agrees to release the employer from this kind of damage claim as a term of settlement is one way to limit the legal exposure associated with this kind of claim.
If you have any questions about an employer’s obligations to a terminated employee, please call us at 1–888-640-1728 or email us at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022
Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 - Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency...
Reducing Litigation Risk
In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...
Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy
A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October...