We often get calls from individuals who are thinking about quitting and immediately starting work with a competitor. The person calls us because his employment contract has a non-solicitation clause and he wants to know if it is enforceable. This is usually only the beginning of the conversation.
Here are four questions that you should get answered before you accept a job with a competitor.
1. Have you agreed to non-competition and/or non-solicitation restrictions for a period of time? If so, you need to find out whether these restrictive covenants are likely legally enforceable.
2. If a non-solicitation restriction does not exist (or it is likely not enforceable) are you a “fiduciary” which is generally a senior executive or a salesperson who is the face of the company to the customer? If so, you may have a common law duty not to solicit customers for a reasonable period of time.
3. Is there a clause in your employment agreement which sets out how much notice of resignation you must provide? If not, did you know your former employer could sue you for wrongful resignation?
4. Does your new employer want you to immediately solicit the customers of your former employer? If so, have you thought about what will happen if your former employer starts a law suit?
For more information about employment contracts, see our blogs here.
If you are thinking about working for a competitor, and you want to speak with an employment lawyer with experience in this area, contact us at [email protected] or 1-888-640-1728 (toll free) or 647-633-9894 (within the GTA).
This blog explains why you should carefully review a job offer before accepting it.
Are clauses that purport to waive an employee’s years of service for the purposes of severance/notice pay enforceable? It’s all important when your company is sold. Here is what to look for.
As we have written before, an employer may generally terminate an employee for any good business reason, as long as it provides the employee with adequate notice of termination (or pay in lieu of notice). Failure to provide adequate notice results in a wrongful...