Miscarriage as Disability: Rights for Women Who Experience Pregnancy Loss

by | Apr 6, 2016 | For Employees

Miscarriage as Disability: Rights for Women Who Experience Pregnancy Loss

by | Apr 6, 2016 | For Employees

A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (“the Tribunal”) has reclassified miscarriage from a solely gender-based issue to one of disability.

The Decision

In Mou v. MHPM Project Leaders, the Respondent requested the Tribunal dismiss the application because Ms. Mou had failed to demonstrate that she had a disability.  Ms. Mou was employed by MHPM Project Leaders when she experienced a slip and fall and a miscarriage in 2013.  The employer argued that these incidents were temporary in nature and that Ms. Mou fully recovered from them so they could not be considered disabilities under the Human Rights Code (“the Code”).  The Tribunal disagreed.

The Tribunal held that section 10 of the Code does not require an applicant to prove that a disability is permanent. The Tribunal acknowledged that minor illness like a cold or flu should not be considered disabilities. However, in finding that a miscarriage is a disability, the Tribunal held that is it “not a common ailment, and it is certainly not transitory” and that women may experience significant emotional long-lasting distress from a miscarriage.

Impact on future Human Rights Cases

The Code prohibits employers from taking certain things into account when deciding to terminate an individual’s employment. For example, if a woman becomes pregnant, an employer cannot terminate her employment because of the pregnancy.  This would be considered sex-based discrimination.

Until Mou, this was true of miscarriage as well.  For example, in the decision Osvald v. Videocomm Technologies, the Tribunal held that the employer had discriminated against the employee on the basis of sex for terminating her employment after learning of her miscarriage.

Previously, if a woman experienced pregnancy loss and then lost her job, she had to show that the employer took the miscarriage into account in terminating her employment.  Or, she had to show that a disability, like depression, arose from the miscarriage and the employer terminated her employment due to that disability.

Now, a woman can state that pregnancy loss itself is a disability.  If the miscarriage affects a woman’s work performance, for example, and the employer takes the performance into account in terminating the employment, this could be a breach of the Code on the basis of disability. This would be true even if the woman had not received a diagnosis like depression.

The Mou decision likely arose because Ms. Mou failed to claim in her application that she was discriminated against due to sex.  Nonetheless, the decision increases the ways in which a women who have experienced discrimination due to a pregnancy loss can assert their rights.

If you have experienced discrimination on the basis of sex or disability a lawyer at MacLeod Law Firm is able to assist you. Please contact us at [email protected] or 647-204-8107.

The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.

 

k

Recent Posts

k

Recent Posts

Justice for Unionized Employees

Unionized employees often seek our advice regarding human rights issues in their workplace. Sometimes this is because human rights violations have occurred and the union is not assisting them. Other times, the union itself may be part of the problem. The rights of...

read more

The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.

 

k

Recent Posts

k

Recent Posts

Justice for Unionized Employees

Unionized employees often seek our advice regarding human rights issues in their workplace. Sometimes this is because human rights violations have occurred and the union is not assisting them. Other times, the union itself may be part of the problem. The rights of...

read more

Toronto Office

702 - 2 Bloor Street West,
Toronto, ON M4W 3E2

Barrie Office

277 - 92 Caplan Avenue,
Barrie, ON L4N 9J2

Collingwood Office

220 - 1 First Street
Collingwood, ON
L9Y 1A1

Locations

Toronto Office

700 - 2 Bloor Street West, Toronto ON M4W 3E2

Barrie Office

277 - 92 Caplan Avenue, Barrie ON L4N 9J2

Collingwood Office

220 - 1 First Street, Collingwood, ON L9Y 1A1

Translate

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!