Cannabis Legalization: Behind the Smoke and Mirrors
Whether you’ve been looking forward to this day – October 17, 2018 – or whether you’ve been dreading it, the legalization of recreational cannabis in Canada is officially here.
Although employers have had over a year and a half to prepare for legalization, a recent Ipsos poll found that managers and employees are not on the same page when it comes to their respective expectations concerning the use of recreational cannabis in the workplace.
Only 18% of non-management staff say that management has communicated clear expectations on the use of recreational cannabis in the workplace. This number is at odds with manager expectations: 55% of managers believe employees clearly understand management’s expectations.
Leaving employees to self-educate on the changes that follow legalization is not a good idea. Only 16% of those non-management employees polled said they are “very familiar” with the changes and with where they are allowed to consume cannabis. Most others are only somewhat familiar (52%) or not very familiar (24%). Finally, 17% of working Canadians believe it is possible to use recreational cannabis before going to work or during work hours (including lunch and coffee breaks), while another 6% definitely believe it is permissible to do so after October 17, 2018.
Given the disconnect between managers and employees’ expectations, it is important to communicate these expectations through workplace policies. If you already have a policy, here are a few other questions to consider.
- Does your current policy simply refer to illegal drugs? With the legalization of cannabis, such language will not cover recreational cannabis. Also, impairment can come from various sources, including prescribed, legal medication.
- Does your current policy include a distinction between recreational and medical cannabis?
- Does your current policy define the workplace? What if an employee travels for work, or attends many after-hour functions? Does your current policy state under which circumstances cannabis consumption is not permitted as an employee?
There is no one size fits all drug policy. It should be tailored to the needs of your business. We suggest that all employers develop a policy, and then communicate it to employees and provide any necessary training. We are hosting seminars in Toronto and Barrie next week and one of the topics we will be covering is some of the components that should be included in a drug policy. Click here for more information on this seminar, or call Judy Lam at 647-204-8107
For over 30 years, Doug MacLeod of the MacLeod Law Firm has been advising employers on all aspects of the employment relationship. If you have any questions, you can contact him directly at 416-317-9894 or at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Tags: Accommodation Barrie Employment Lawyer Disability Doug MacLeod Drug And Alcohol Policy Drug And Alcohol Testing Duty To Accommodate Employment Law Updates Employment Lawyers Barrie Employment Lawyers Toronto Health and Safety Human Resource Policies Human Rights Legalization MacLeod Law Firm Marijuana Legalization Occupational Health & Safety Recreational Cannabis Toronto Employment Lawyer Training Workplace Policy Workplace Safety
Recent Posts
Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022
Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 - Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency...
Reducing Litigation Risk
In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...
Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy
A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October...