Since 2010 there has been confusion around the term “workplace harassment” in Ontario.
Until that time, workplace harassment was generally limited to sexual, racial and 14 other types of harassment under the Ontario Human Rights Code (Code). For this type of complaint, an employee could file an internal harassment complaint (if the employer had a no-discrimination policy) and/or file a complaint against the employer with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.
In 2010 the Occupational Health & Safety Act (OHSA) was amended. Now an employee can file a complaint with her employer if she believes she has been harassed. “Workplace harassment” means engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct against a worker in a workplace that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome.
What is an employer to do with harassment complaints?
- An employer who employs 6 or more employees must prepare a policy with respect to workplace harassment, develop and maintain a program to implement the policy and post it in the workplace. This program must set out how the employer will investigate and deal with incidents and complaints of workplace harassment
- We recommend that most employers implement a no-discrimination policy which includes an internal complaint process. This, however, is not required by law.
- If an employee claims she has been “harassed”, take the complaint seriously and investigate it.
- At the onset, determine whether the employee is claiming harassment under the Code, or under OHSA. Then, follow the applicable internal complaint process.
- Decide whether to conduct the investigation internally or to retain an outside workplace investigator.
Employers should concern themselves with the safety and security of their employee’s. Otherwise, a toxic workplace can develop where employees become unproductive and/or sick. All employers (except very small employers) should therefore have a workplace harassment policy under OHSA, and a no-discrimination policy to address potential Code violations. We believe implementing these policies will increase the chance that harassment will be identified and addressed quickly and reduce the chance that the employee will file an external complaint.
In February 2017, after a 40 day trial, an Ontario trial judge ordered the RCMP to pay Peter Merrifield $100,000 in general damages, $41,000 in special damages, and $825,000 in legal costs. In doing so, the trial judge recognized the tort of harassment. For my blog on...read more
Wrongful Dismissal Update: How to Reduce Termination Pay for Employees Who Earn Variable Compensation
Some employees receive a large percentage of their total compensation in variable compensation. A much litigated issue is whether the employer is required to pay variable compensation to a terminated employee during the applicable notice period and if so how is this...read more
An arbitrator who upholds a grievance can reinstate the employee, or order the employer to pay the employee damages. In a 2018 arbitration case, Arbitrator Surdykowksi decided how to calculate damages for an employee who was not reinstated. Facts Dr. Bernard was a...read more