Systemic Discrimination and Long-Term Human Rights Violations
Systemic Discrimination and Long-Term Human Rights Violations
Employees who have experienced discrimination at work can file an application with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (“Tribunal”). The Ontario Human Rights Code provides that the application must be filed within one year of the discrimination unless there was a “series of incidents.” Where a series of incidents occurs, the application must be filed within one year of the last incident.
The Tribunal has previously held that to constitute a “series of incidents,” allegations of discrimination must have some connection or nexus. They must reasonably be viewed as a pattern of conduct with a common theme, similar parties and/or circumstances.
Systemic Discrimination
The issue of a series of discriminatory events often arises in systemic discrimination. Systemic discrimination is a pattern of behaviour, policies or practices that are part of the structures of an organization, which can create or perpetuate a disadvantage for a protected group. Where systemic discrimination occurs, often the patterns or events are seemingly separate and discreet, with long gaps between them, and may not appear to be related to a prohibited ground.
The Series of Events Applied to Systemic Discrimination
A recent decision of the Tribunal re-considered the issue of a “series of events.”
In that case, the Association of Ontario Midwives alleged that the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care had permitted, perpetuated, and condoned sex-based compensation for midwives dating back to 1993. In addressing what the appropriate period of compensation might be, the Tribunal considered whether the latest incident of systemic discrimination was part of a series of events dating back to 1993. The Tribunal ultimately concluded that the ongoing payment of compensation to midwives for services rendered constituted a “series of events.”
In its decision, the Tribunal found that a “series of events” need not be linear and continuous between all allegations. The phrase can mean that matters are “connected” by way of a single chronological thread, or as a combination of events, policies, practices and attitudes. Allegations of discrimination must be viewed comprehensively and collectively.
The Tribunal recognized that patterns of discrimination can persist over a long period of time. A gap of more than one year between incidents does not sever what are otherwise connected incidents. A claim of long-term systemic discrimination can be advanced, and will be considered timely, so long as it is brought within one year of the latest incident.
This decision will assist marginalized groups that seek compensation for long-term wrongs through the Human Rights Tribunal process.
If you have experienced discrimination at work and you want to speak with an employment lawyer, contact us at [email protected] or 1-888-640-1728 (toll free) or 647-633-9894 (within the GTA).
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Justice for Unionized Employees
Unionized employees often seek our advice regarding human rights issues in their workplace. Sometimes this is because human rights violations have occurred and the union is not assisting them. Other times, the union itself may be part of the problem. The rights of...
Employee Entitlements Upon Termination
Termination is a stressful experience for any employee. An employee who has been fired needs to understand what their employer owes them, and what their employer is offering them. When employers do not make this clear, additional damages could be due to the employee....
Notice of Termination: Appeal Court Weighs in
When terminated, an employee should generally receive reasonable notice of termination or pay instead of notice. This is unless the employee has signed a contract that contains an enforceable termination clause (which we’ve written about here). The calculation of the...