Recent Court Ruling on Terminating a Disabled Employee
Recent Court Ruling: Terminating a disabled employee can lead to human rights damages that are MUCH greater than those for wrongful dismissal
A March 2013 decision by an adjudicator appointed under the Ontario Human Rights Code should make employers sit up and take notice of their duty to accommodate disabled employees. The employee was reinstated and the employer was ordered to pay her, among other things, 10 YEARS back pay and $ 30 000 in discrimination damages.
The Facts
The employee was terminated after almost 16 years employment. For the last 10 years of her employment, she was employed as a school board’s Supervisor, Regulated Substances, Asbestos. At the time of her termination, she was disabled. Her disability was a reaction to the highly stressful nature of her job, and her fear that, in making a mistake about asbestos removal, she could be held personally liable for a breach of the Occupational Health & Safety Act.
The Decision
Prior to being terminated, the employee was on long-term disability. When she was no longer disabled she attempted to return to work. The adjudicator concluded the employer failed to take steps to investigate possible forms of accommodation, and failed to offer the employee available, alternative work.
The Remedies
1. Reinstatement. The courts do not generally reinstate wrongfully dismissed non-union employees; however, the adjudicator reinstated the employee.
2. Damages for lost wages. When assessing damages, the courts generally calculate lost wages by considering how much remuneration an employee would have earned during a reasonable notice period (less any income earned during this period) which would likely have been in the 15 to 18 month range in this case. The adjudicator however ordered the employer to pay the employee 10 YEARS lost wages which was the length of time between the termination and the date of reinstatement.
3. General damages. It is only in exceptional cases that courts order general damages in wrongful dismissal cases. In this case, the adjudicator ordered the employer to pay the employee $ 30 000 in general damages for the injury to her dignity, feelings and self-respect.
Lessons to be learned:
- When presented with an accommodation request by a disabled employee, the employer should take steps to investigate possible forms of accommodation.
- If a disabled employee cannot perform her pre-disability job, the employer should give consideration to her ability to perform alternate employment opportunities.
If you have any questions about accommodating disabled employees, you can reach us at 1-800-640-1728 or at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Recent Posts
Non-Compliance with Mandatory COVID Vaccine Policies
In the last month or two many (if not most) organizations have introduced a mandatory COVID vaccination or/or a COVID negative policy. A mandatory vaccination policy requires an employee to get double vaccinated, whereas a COVID negative policy requires an employee to...
Wrongful Dismissal: How To Reduce Litigation Risk
The best way to reduce litigation risk in relation to an employee termination is to agree in advance how much notice of termination (or pay in lieu of notice) an employee is entitled to receive. Employers rarely provide ANY notice of termination so the employee’s...
Mandatory COVID Vaccination Policies
Like most employment lawyers, I have been getting calls from employers asking whether they can require employees to get vaccinated for COVID before returning to the workplace.