Accommodating Disabled Employees: Can an Employee Demand to Work at a Different Workplace?
Accommodating Disabled Employees
I have written a number of blogs on the challenges associated with accommodating employees with mental disabilities. I have also blogged on the new obligations that were imposed on employers with 50 or more employees earlier this year with respect to disabled employees including the requirement to prepare a written accommodation plan.
Can a Disabled Employee Demand to Be Moved Away from a Co-Worker?
I have been involved in a number of cases where an employee has claimed that he could not work in the same work space as a co-worker for mental health reasons and asked to be moved to a different physical location.
The Case: The Emond v. Treasury Board
In a recent case, an adjudicator concluded that an employer failed to accommodate an employee on long-term disability who requested that she be permitted to work in a different work location than a co-worker for mental health reasons. As a result the adjudicator ordered the employer to move the employee to another of its nearby workplaces, and to compensate the employee for the difference between the amount she received while on long-term disability and her salary due to the employer’s failure to accommodate.
The Facts: The Devil Is In the Details
Did a disability exist? The adjudicator concluded that the employee suffered from emotional stress caused by a co-worker. Although the adjudicator recognized that “stress cannot automatically be associated with a disability or an incapacity,” she concluded that the employee’s medical condition did constitute a disability or an incapacity, thereby triggering the employer’s duty to accommodate.
Was there medical evidence supporting the accommodation request? In the opinions of her general physician and her psychologist, the employee would be capable of returning to work if she was permitted to work in a different workplace than the co-worker. Although the employer suggested that the employee should attempt to return to work on a different floor of the same workplace, both of the treating physicians disagreed. The employer refused to permit the employee to work in a different workplace or from her home. The adjudicator commented that the employer did not call any rebuttal medical evidence nor discredit the employee’s treating physicians.
Lessons to be Learned
- Do not refuse an employee request to move work locations for mental health reasons before carefully considering the reason for the request.
- Request medical reports in support of the employee’s request. If you are not satisfied with the documentation provided by the employee, send the employee to a physician or disability management consultant of your choosing if you have the right to do so.
- Prepare an individual accommodation plan under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
- Update your employment contract if your organization does not have the right to send a disabled employee to a doctor of the employer’s choosing.
- Maintain regular contact with the disabled employee and update the individual accommodation plan as needed.
For over 25 years, Doug MacLeod of the MacLeod Law Firm has been advising employers on all aspects of the employment relationship. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Recent Posts
Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022
Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 - Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency...
Reducing Litigation Risk
In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...
Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy
A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October...