As I noted in an earlier blog, the Supreme Court in Hryniak v Mauldin, “rewrote the law on summary judgment” and opened the doors to a fast and cost-effective method of obtaining judgment for terminated employees. The courts since specifically recognized that straightforward wrongful dismissal cases are particularly well-suited for summary judgment.
However, in the past two years, the Ontario Court of Appeal has scaled back on thise legal route.
In 2016, the Court of Appeal in Singh v Concept Plastics Ltd. held that summary judgment was not often appropriate for claims brought under simplified procedure. Specifically, the Court held that Rule 76.04(1) put “significant limitations” on an employer’s ability to prove its case. As I said in 2016, Singh signaled to employment lawyers to think twice about proceeding with summary judgment, especially with claims initiated under simplified procedure.
The Court of Appeal’s approach continued in the recent Butera v Chown, Cairns LLP decision.
In this case, the court overturned an award for partial summary judgment. The Court repeated its words of caution from Singh, holding that partial judgment can raise the following problems:
- Delay. Parties may use the process as a delay tactic, and even where a motion for partial summary judgment is brought in good faith it increases the time to reach a final decision.
- Expense. The motion, and related appeals, may be very expensive.
- Lost Judicial Resources. Judges are already spending significant time deciding summary judgment motions, and partial summary judgment does not even result in a final decision.
- Inconsistent Findings. The record at trial would be more expansive than a partial judgment motion and could result in inconsistent findings between the partial summary judgment and trial.
Motions for summary judgment still provide an expeditious method of handling wrongful dismissal claims. However, the Court of Appeal decisions should give pause to parties in determining whether summary judgment is the best route to follow for their case.
If parties are keen on proceeding with summary judgment, first evaluate whether to bring the claim under the “regular” procedure instead of simplified procedure, if possible. Then, unless an element of the claim can be clearly bifurcated, avoid partial summary judgment.
If you have been terminated and are considering your legal options, you should consult a lawyer or contact us at [email protected] or 647-204-8107 and one of our lawyers would be happy to assist you.
Are clauses that purport to waive an employee’s years of service for the purposes of severance/notice pay enforceable? It’s all important when your company is sold. Here is what to look for.read more
As we have written before, an employer may generally terminate an employee for any good business reason, as long as it provides the employee with adequate notice of termination (or pay in lieu of notice). Failure to provide adequate notice results in a wrongful...read more
If you have lost your job and need temporary income support, do you know what to do? In Canada, you can apply for Employment Insurance (“EI”) for partial income replacement from the Federal government. To learn about the different types of EI and whether you would be...read more