Investigating Sexual Harassment Complaints: Do you have a policy?
We provide employment law advice to small employers in Ontario. When I meet with a small employer for the first time we discuss the organization’s current employment policies and practices. One question we ask is: Do you have a sexual harassment policy?
Although not required by Ontario law, we recommend that most employers implement a sexual harassment policy that includes a complaint procedure.
We make this recommendation for a number of reasons.
One reason is to minimize the risk that the employer will be found to have failed to take reasonable steps to address a sexual harassment complaint.
In at least two cases, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has ordered an employer to pay $ 7500 because it failed to reasonably investigate a sexual harassment complaint.
In one of these cases, the Tribunal made this order even though it concluded that sexual harassment did not take place.
Here are five questions the Tribunal will consider when determining whether an investigation is reasonable:
1. Was there a suitable anti-discrimination/harassment policy?
2. Was there a proper complaint mechanism in place?
3. Was adequate training given to management and employees?
4. Once an internal complaint was made, did the employer treat it seriously?
5. Did the employer communicate its findings and actions to the complainant?
The Tribunal has stated that an employer need not provide an affirmative answer in every case in order to be judged to have acted reasonably, although that would be the exception rather than the norm. The Tribunal will consider the answer to each question individually and then in the aggregate before passing judgment on whether the employer acted reasonably.
If you have any questions about sexual harassment policies, please call us at 417 977-9894 or email us at [email protected]
The material and information in this blog and this website are for general information only. They should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. The authors make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of any information referred to in this blog or its links. No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this website or blog. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice from a lawyer duly licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. These materials do not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and any of the authors or the MacLeod Law Firm.
Recent Posts
Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022
Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 - Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency...
Reducing Litigation Risk
In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it...
Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy
A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October...