<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MacLeod Law Firm | MacLeod Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/tag/macleod-law-firm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca</link>
	<description>Employment &#38; Labour Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 20:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/top-stories-of-2022/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2022]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Disease Emergency Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recording Workplace Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 &#8211; Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (“IDEL”) regulation under the Employment Standards Act, did [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 – Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (“IDEL”) regulation under the Employment Standards Act, did not change the common law. So, this kind of temporary layoff is…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/top-stories-of-2022/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing Litigation Risk</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/reducing-litigation-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty To Mitigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Terminations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[With Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Without Cause]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it was anything but a simple case. It [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it was anything but a simple case. It addressed some of the litigation risk inherent in wrongful dismissal litigation.</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/reducing-litigation-risk/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working for Workers Act, 2021: New Obligations Imposed on Employers</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/working-for-workers-act-2021-new-obligations-imposed-on-employers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill 27]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Competition Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working For Workers Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New obligations are being imposed on employers as a result of the Bill 27, or the Working for Workers Act, 2021. Three new obligations that will be imposed on employers: 1. Employers who employ 25 or more employees will be required to have a written policy with respect to disconnecting from work. The term “disconnecting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New obligations are being imposed on employers as a result of the Bill 27, or the Working for Workers Act, 2021. Three new obligations that will be imposed on employers: 1. Employers who employ 25 or more employees will be required to have a written policy with respect to disconnecting from work. The term “disconnecting from work” is defined to mean not engaging in work-related…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/working-for-workers-act-2021-new-obligations-imposed-on-employers/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have reasonable notice periods increased during the COVID pandemic?</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/reasonablenotice-periods-covid-pandemic/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19 Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Terminations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Notice Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waksdale]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I will tell anyone who asks &#8211; and many people who don’t ask &#8211; that every employer should require every employee to sign an employment contract with an enforceable termination clause. More and more employers are doing so, however there are still many employees who have not signed an employment contract with an enforceable termination [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will tell anyone who asks – and many people who don’t ask – that every employer should require every employee to sign an employment contract with an enforceable termination clause. More and more employers are doing so, however there are still many employees who have not signed an employment contract with an enforceable termination clause. Particularly because of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/reasonablenotice-periods-covid-pandemic/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Compliance with Mandatory COVID Vaccine Policies</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/non-compliance-with-mandatory-covid-vaccine-policies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accommodation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Vaccination Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covid-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory COVID Vaccinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Human Rights Code]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the last month or two many (if not most) organizations have introduced a mandatory COVID vaccination or/or a COVID negative policy. A mandatory vaccination policy requires an employee to get double vaccinated, whereas a COVID negative policy requires an employee to regularly test negative for COVID. A mandatory COVID vaccine policy must exempt those [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last month or two many (if not most) organizations have introduced a mandatory COVID vaccination or/or a COVID negative policy. A mandatory vaccination policy requires an employee to get double vaccinated, whereas a COVID negative policy requires an employee to regularly test negative for COVID. A mandatory COVID vaccine policy must exempt those who qualify for an exemption for medical…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/non-compliance-with-mandatory-covid-vaccine-policies/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrongful Dismissal: How To Reduce Litigation Risk</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/how-to-reduce-litigation-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The best way to reduce litigation risk in relation to an employee termination is to agree in advance how much notice of termination (or pay in lieu of notice) an employee is entitled to receive. Employers rarely provide ANY notice of termination so the employee’s employment contract should have a termination clause setting out how [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to reduce litigation risk in relation to an employee termination is to agree in advance how much notice of termination (or pay in lieu of notice) an employee is entitled to receive. Employers rarely provide ANY notice of termination so the employee’s employment contract should have a termination clause setting out how termination pay is calculated. Kraft v.</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/how-to-reduce-litigation-risk/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory COVID Vaccination Policies</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/mandatory-covid-vaccination-policies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty To Accommodate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Vaccinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return to Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinated Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Like most employment lawyers, I have been getting calls from employers asking whether they can require employees to get vaccinated for COVID before returning to the workplace.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mandatory COVID vaccination is a controversial issue at the moment. Children will be returning to school in a couple weeks and many parents want all staff and children over 12 vaccinated. The federal Liberals announced it is introducing mandatory vaccinations in a number of settings just before it called an election to create a wedge issue with the PC party who is against mandatory vaccination.</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/mandatory-covid-vaccination-policies/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court says $ 2.5M payroll is not limited to Ontario Payroll for Severance Pay Purposes</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/severancepay-updates-ontario-employers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawkes v. Max Aicher (North America) Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severance Pay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An employee with 5 years service is entitled to one week severance pay for each year of service to a maximum of 26 weeks severance pay under the Employment Standards Act (ESA) IF the employer’s payroll exceeds $ 2.5M. In 2014, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice concluded payroll is not limited to Ontario payroll but [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An employee with 5 years service is entitled to one week severance pay for each year of service to a maximum of 26 weeks severance pay under the Employment Standards Act (ESA) IF the employer’s payroll exceeds $ 2.5M. In 2014, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice concluded payroll is not limited to Ontario payroll but the Ontario Labour Relations Board has not followed this decision and has…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/severancepay-updates-ontario-employers/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Terminated Employees Can Prove Contract is Unenforceable</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/terminated-employees-prove-contract-is-unenforceable/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Labour Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicole Simes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminated Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clauses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=221350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Terminated employees who worked for federal employers may be entitled to more termination pay. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often write about termination clauses and the impact that they have on terminated employees. This type of clause can change the pay a terminated employee receives by thousands, sometimes hundreds of thousands, of dollars. Often though, the legal cases fighting about the validity of termination clauses are based on provincially regulated employers. Federally regulated employers include…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/terminated-employees-prove-contract-is-unenforceable/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Refuses to Enforce Contractual Language Limiting Termination Pay</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/court-refuses-to-enforce-contractual-language-limiting-termination-pay/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Departing Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Notice Of Resignation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severance Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severance Packages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=220170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have written several blogs on whether wrongful dismissal damages include compensation for the variable compensation the employee would have earned during the applicable notice period.  Most cases consider whether the language in a variable compensation plan which purports to limit or eliminate the employee’s entitlement to variable compensation during the notice period is enforceable. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written several blogs on whether wrongful dismissal damages include compensation for the variable compensation the employee would have earned during the applicable notice period. Most cases consider whether the language in a variable compensation plan which purports to limit or eliminate the employee’s entitlement to variable compensation during the notice period is enforceable.</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/court-refuses-to-enforce-contractual-language-limiting-termination-pay/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
