Every two weeks, I blog about a recent development in employment law or human rights law. Twenty-six blogs a year means there are a lot of new developments but I do not write about all of the changes in the employment law field each year.
I think employers currently need enhanced legal information on three human resource issues and so I am hosting a “learn by doing” seminar in October 2017.
This blog discusses these three areas.
Accommodating Employees with Mental Disabilities
Most human rights complaints filed with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario involve a disability and the number of claims filed by employees with a mental disability is skyrocketing. Accommodating an employee with a mental disability is extremely complicated from a legal perspective. The costs of failing to accommodate can be staggering.
In our seminar, we will discuss the legal landscape surrounding accommodation requests. We will then break into groups to review a specific request for accommodation and discuss how to respond to the request.
What to Do When the Ministry of Labour Comes Calling
On May 30, 2017 the Ontario government tabled proposed changes to the Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”) and also announced it intends to hire an additional 175 Ministry of Labour inspectors and that it intends to inspect 10% of Ontario workplaces each year. In addition, the Ministry of Labour has been pro-actively targeting certain industries for inspections the last few years. We have written about the considerable fines that such an inspector can impose on an employer for violations of Ontario’s employment statutes.
These developments mean that the Ministry of Labour is no longer waiting to receive a complaint from an employee before inspecting a workplace for compliance with the ESA and the Occupational Health & Safety Act (the “OHSA”). In our experience, most employers are not in full compliance with these laws.
In our seminar, we will discuss an employer’s legal obligations under the ESA including the proposed changes to the ESA. Some of these changes are expected to take effect on January 1, 2018. We will then break into groups and review one specific employer and discuss what needs to be done to bring this employer into compliance.
I think the best employment law investment is a well drafted legally enforceable employment contract.
I have drafted employment contracts for most of my clients but these contracts need to be reviewed periodically for at least three reasons. Changes in employment laws like the ESA may require changes in your contract. Another reason is because the courts are constantly considering the enforceability of different clauses that are contained in an employment contract. For example, in the last two years, the courts have refused to enforce many termination clauses. Yet another reason is because an issue may have developed in your workplace that you can manage by adding a clause to your employment contract.
In our seminar, we will discuss the benefits of using an employment contract, the kinds of issues that can be addressed in a contract, and what kinds of clauses the courts are refusing to enforce. We will also break out into small groups to review contractual clauses and discuss whether the clause is likely to be enforced.
The seminar for GTA employers is taking place on Monday, October 16, 2017 and the seminar for Simcoe County employers is taking place on Friday, October 20, 2017. Registration is limited to 30 for each seminar. The cost is $ 399 per person plus H.S.T.
For over 25 years, Doug MacLeod of the MacLeod Law Firm has been advising employers on all aspects of the employment relationship. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]
Constructive Dismissal Update: Employee Alleging Workplace Harassment Barred from Pursuing a Civil Claim
An employee quit her employment because of workplace harassment and filed a constructive dismissal action. The Employer brought an application under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (the “WSIA”) and convinced an adjudicator that the action was statute barred....
Wrongful Dismissal Update: Judge Upholds Just Cause Termination for a 30 Year Employee Who Touched a Co-Workers Buttock
After a 10 day trial, an Ontario judge recently concluded that touching a female’s buttock in the presence of four witnesses, who had conflicting versions of what happened, was just cause for termination for an employee with 30 years service who had a clean...
The issue of whether a termination clause limits an employee’s entitlement to the minimum notice set out in the Employment Standards Act may be the most litigated issue in employment law over the past 5 years.