<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>For Employers | MacLeod Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/category/for-employers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca</link>
	<description>Employment &#38; Labour Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Doug’s Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2022</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/top-stories-of-2022/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2022]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Disease Emergency Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recording Workplace Conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 &#8211; Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (“IDEL”) regulation under the Employment Standards Act, did [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my top 5 employment law stories for 2022: 1. COVID 19 – Temporary Layoffs This issue remains my number one story because this issue impacts so many court cases. Some judges have concluded that a temporary layoff set out in the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (“IDEL”) regulation under the Employment Standards Act, did not change the common law. So, this kind of temporary layoff is…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/top-stories-of-2022/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing Litigation Risk</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/reducing-litigation-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty To Mitigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Terminations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[With Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Without Cause]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it was anything but a simple case. It [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent case, Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (CanLII),an employer was ordered to pay a long service employee the equivalent of about 3 years pay and contribute about $ 35 000 to his legal fees. Although this was a without cause termination case, it was anything but a simple case. It addressed some of the litigation risk inherent in wrongful dismissal litigation.</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/reducing-litigation-risk/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Law Update: Electronic Monitoring Policy</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/employment-law-update-electronic-monitoring/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacLeod Law Firm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Monitoring Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October 11, 2022.  As electronic monitoring practices vary widely between businesses [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new amendment to the Employment Standards Act requires employers with 25 or more employees on January 1st of a given year to put in place a written policy regarding any electronic monitoring processes they use to monitor employees. The deadline for 2022 is October 11, 2022. As electronic monitoring practices vary widely between businesses and different industries, the specific practices of…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/employment-law-update-electronic-monitoring/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Reason to Periodically Review Your Employment Contract</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/employmentcontractreview/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contract Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Clauses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After the Court of Appeal’s 2020 decision in Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc. many employers revised the termination clause in their standard employment contract because its existing termination clause was no longer enforceable. Now along comes another Ontario court case that renders an otherwise enforceable termination clause unenforceable because there was a specific penalty [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Court of Appeal’s 2020 decision in Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc. many employers revised the termination clause in their standard employment contract because its existing termination clause was no longer enforceable. Now along comes another Ontario court case that renders an otherwise enforceable termination clause unenforceable because there was a specific penalty clause in the…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/employmentcontractreview/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Unpaid IDEL Trigger a Constructive Dismissal? Court Declines to Answer</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/does-unpaid-idel-trigger-a-constructive-dismissal-court-declines-to-answer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covid-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19 Pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEL Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Disease Emergency Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O. Reg. 228/20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unpaid Leave]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent case, Taylor v. Hanley Hospitality Inc., 2022 ONCA 376, both lawyers asked a three judge panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) to decide whether a law which allows an employer to force an employee to take an unpaid leave under the ESA’s IDEL regulation, which is in effect during the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent case, Taylor v. Hanley Hospitality Inc., 2022 ONCA 376, both lawyers asked a three judge panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) to decide whether a law which allows an employer to force an employee to take an unpaid leave under the ESA’s IDEL regulation, which is in effect during the COVID pandemic, is NOT a constructive dismissal under the ESA, nevertheless is still a constructive…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/does-unpaid-idel-trigger-a-constructive-dismissal-court-declines-to-answer/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Secretly Recording A Workplace Conversation Just Cause for Termination?</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/is-secretly-recording-a-workplace-conversation-just-cause-for-termination/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Terminations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyer Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just Cause Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Conduct]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More and more employees are secretly recording workplace conversations. Although it not is not a crime to secretly record a workplace conversation if you are a party to it, one judge recently concluded it is just cause for termination. This blog discusses this case. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership (the “Company”) terminated Mr. Shaligan’s employment without [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more employees are secretly recording workplace conversations. Although it not is not a crime to secretly record a workplace conversation if you are a party to it, one judge recently concluded it is just cause for termination. This blog discusses this case. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership (the “Company”) terminated Mr. Shaligan’s employment without just cause.</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/is-secretly-recording-a-workplace-conversation-just-cause-for-termination/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Government Proposes More Employment Laws</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/ontario-government-proposes-more-employment-laws/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 04:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill 88]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disconnecting From Work Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gig Worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OHSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Employment Lawyer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my last blog, I summarized some new employment laws that the Ontario government passed in December 2021. On February 28, 2022 the Ford government proposed more new employment legislation when it tabled Bill 88.  This blog discusses three parts of Bill 88; that is, (i) a new law that would apply to gig workers [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my last blog, I summarized some new employment laws that the Ontario government passed in December 2021. On February 28, 2022 the Ford government proposed more new employment legislation when it tabled Bill 88. This blog discusses three parts of Bill 88; that is, (i) a new law that would apply to gig workers who are currently mostly unregulated, (ii) a requirement that some employers…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/ontario-government-proposes-more-employment-laws/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer Update: Recent Changes to Ontario’s Employment Standards Act</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/employer-update-recent-changes-to-ontarios-employment-standards-act/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disconnecting From Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disconnecting From Work Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fixed-Fee Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In December 2021, the Doug Ford government amended Ontario’s Employment Standards Act. This blog discusses two of these changes. 1. Prohibition against Non-Compete Agreements As of October 25, 2021, employers are prohibited from entering into employment contracts or other agreements with an employee that are, or that include, a “non-compete agreement,“ which is defined as [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December 2021, the Doug Ford government amended Ontario’s Employment Standards Act. This blog discusses two of these changes. 1. Prohibition against Non-Compete Agreements As of October 25, 2021, employers are prohibited from entering into employment contracts or other agreements with an employee that are, or that include, a “non-compete agreement,“ which is defined as an agreement…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/employer-update-recent-changes-to-ontarios-employment-standards-act/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 Employment Law Stories of 2021</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/top-5-employment-law-stories-of-2021/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 21:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID Pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covid-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory Vaccination Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was largely an employment COVID lawyer this year and a mandatory COVID vaccine policy lawyer for a part of the year. So, not surprisingly my top employment law stories for 2021 are all COVID related. COVID 19 &#8211; Temporary Layoffs Under the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (“IDEL”) regulation under the Employment Standards Act, a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was largely an employment COVID lawyer this year and a mandatory COVID vaccine policy lawyer for a part of the year. So, not surprisingly my top employment law stories for 2021 are all COVID related. Under the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (“IDEL”) regulation under the Employment Standards Act, a temporary layoff that took place during the “COVID 19 period” was deemed not to be a…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/top-5-employment-law-stories-of-2021/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restaurant Owner Ordered to Pay over $ 40 000 for Refusing to Refer to an Employee as They/Them</title>
		<link>https://macleodlawfirm.ca/restaurant-owner-ordered-to-pay-over-40-000-for-refusing-to-refer-to-an-employee-as-they-them/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[For Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Barrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Pronouns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Code]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleodlawfirm.ca/?p=222381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An employer cannot discriminate on the basis of gender identity. An employer is required to refer to an employee using the pronoun of the employee’s choice. Refusal to do so is a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”).  An employee can file a no cost, online complaint against the employer under the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An employer cannot discriminate on the basis of gender identity. An employer is required to refer to an employee using the pronoun of the employee’s choice. Refusal to do so is a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”). An employee can file a no cost, online complaint against the employer under the Code, and seek damages against the employer and the person who refuses to use the…</p>
<p><a href="https://macleodlawfirm.ca/restaurant-owner-ordered-to-pay-over-40-000-for-refusing-to-refer-to-an-employee-as-they-them/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
